Working Together for Positive Outcomes
When Johnny (not real name) came to live with
my family and I he was 6 years old. Until Johnny
came to live with us, he had lived a rather
rough and tumble existence in his birth home.
His mother was extremely passive and seldom
intervened when Johnny's father took his
frustrations out on Johnny. In many ways Johnny
was the parent to his two younger siblings.
He especially doted on his 3-year-old sister.
He dressed her and even braided her long blonde
hair. It was a role he assumed and as a result
his parents and grandparents thought he was
just being "a really good big brother."
Because Johnny seemed so mature to his family,
they were surprised and sad when Johnny repeated
kindergarten. A move from one residence to another
had proved to be a setback for him. In his new
school, as part of the Drug Abuse Resistance
Education (DARE), Johnny learned about the dangers
involved with the misuse of drugs, alcohol and
cigarettes. Johnny knew his father drank alcohol
and smoked cigarettes. On a day when school
was released early, Johnny came home and found
his father using and dealing drugs. Johnny's
father got very angry with Johnny when he confronted
him and his friends and told them, "drugs
are not safe and you could die if you use them."
Worrying that his father was going to die made
Johnny realize he had to have some help with
this problem. He shared his concerns with the
school DARE instructor, who ultimately contacted
DHS. When DHS approached his parents, Johnny
got really scared. He knew his father would
be angry and felt that his father would go to
jail because of him. His mother, realizing that
she would be held responsible for neglecting
her children if she stayed with her husband,
immediately went to court and filed for a separation.
Johnny's fears intensified. He felt not
only responsible for his father being arrested,
but also for his family falling apart. He became
suicidal. He ran out in front of a tractor-trailer
truck, hoping to be hit and die. When that attempt
failed, he wrapped his head in a plastic bag.
His mother discovered him and took him by ambulance
to the hospital. Luckily he did not sustain
any long-term affects from the plastic bag as
it was removed soon after he had made the threat.
His mother, knowing that she could not keep
him safe, insisted that he be admitted to the
hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. The evaluation
indicated that Johnny was at high risk for committing
suicide should he return to his home. His mother
agreed for DHS to take custody of Johnny. His
mother retained custody of the two siblings
with the agreement that she would seek family
counseling, parenting classes and refrain from
contact with her husband.
Johnny's mother and I met at the hospital.
The hospital's Family Support Team supported
us both. Johnny's mother, Brenda, and
I discovered we had friends in common and that
helped to reduce the tension between us. Brenda
was sad that her son would reside in foster
care, but was pleased to have him with someone
with whom she felt comfortable. I was pleased
that I would have first hand information from
Johnny's family about his history, his
likes and dislikes. I personally believe that
children, who must live away from their parents,
do better when the substitute family and birth
family get along and work well together. Communication
between all the parties involved in the life
of a child are essential to positive outcomes.
When communication becomes the norm, rather
then the exception, things run more smoothly.
The initial plan was for Johnny to live with
us for about six months. As a team, we met frequently
at the hospital. Johnny's mother worked
hard to pave the way for his return to her home.
She took every class she could find on parenting,
visited faithfully in my home, observed my parenting
techniques and took some of them on as her own.
She had very little financial support, as she
was now a single mother. Her husband who had
seldom provided financially for his family before
now, claimed he was not able to support the
family at all now that he was facing a divorce
and a possible fine for his drug related errors.
Both parents were appointed a court appointed
attorney. Johnny also had an attorney acting
on his behalf.
As weeks and months went by, Johnny's
mother and siblings became stronger and stronger
emotionally. At the six-month juncture in his
placement, an effort was made to return him
to Brenda. She had worked diligently and jumped
through all the hoops and fulfilled the court
ordered agreement. With the support of friends,
family and my family Brenda had become a much
stronger parent and a more self assured individual.
The team was convinced that she and Johnny would
be successful in their reunification. Weekend
visits, including over nights had gone well.
However, Johnny was not accustomed to his mother's
newfound assertiveness and he wanted to return
to his old role as the family leader. He challenged
her repeatedly and ultimately sabotaged the
reunification effort. Brenda was devastated
that after all her hard work she was not able
to maintain her son at home. She was so afraid
that he would harm himself that she did not
feel equipped to keep him. She spoke with the
DHS caseworker and told her that she wanted
him to be back with me. Johnny had to go by
the rules in my home and was able to act like
a child. The assumption from the onset of his
placement was that I was the person in charge,
which allowed him to be a kid.
Brenda and I attended family therapy with Johnny
together. The therapist helped us work out a
system to support Johnny while teaching him
how much his mother had grown and how he could
trust her in the same way he trusted me. Together
Brenda and I spent hours playing with Johnny
and his siblings. With guidance from Johnny's
psychiatrist, I role modeled what we hoped would
be a formula for success. The goal was for Johnny
to trust Brenda as he did me and for Brenda
to trust herself. A year later we were still
struggling to make a successful transition and
ultimately the case worker, support team members,
Brenda and I agreed that long term foster care
with me was in Johnny's best interest.
Visits continued and Johnny spent all of his
holidays and week ends with Brenda. Johnny did
quite well in school and when he was home for
no more then 2 days at a time he did very well.
Johnny was a clever little boy and frequently
played Brenda and I against one another. If
he wanted an expensive toy, he would tell his
mother I said he could have it if she bought
it and/or visa versa. He would tell me that
his mother said he needed a different style
of clothing or a fancier hairstyle or whatever
it was he wanted. Luckily for Brenda and for
me, we spoke to each other on the phone nearly
every day. We met at counseling sessions and
we shared the transporting of him between the
two homes. Brenda and I agreed that Johnny would
not be allowed to manipulate us. Our united
front made for a much more harmonious relationship
and kept Johnny from becoming a very spoiled
little boy. He still tried to manipulate us
and would be angry with us for joining forces.
Now as a young adult, he laughs at the way he
tried to get his way and at how clever his two
mom's were at making sure he did not get
more then his fair share.
I deliberately used the term two moms in the
last paragraph so that I could segue into another
topic. Many foster parents and birth parents
end up with hurt feelings over what the child
or children call their foster parents. In my
foster home we established a relationship with
parents in the placement. I let the mothers
know that I was not trying to take their place.
If a child called me "mom" it was
their choice" not what I asked of them.
Johnny was never made to feel as though he had
to choose between Brenda and myself.
For me, the most successful placements were
the ones where the parents visited in my home.
They were successful because the children saw
us working together. They accepted that my family
was acceptant of theirs and that helped to make
the kids feel better about themselves. The birth
parents felt good because once they were told
the ground rules for visiting in my home, they
had free reign to take care of their own children
and enjoy themselves. The ground rules were
shared, not as an authoritarian gesture, but
as a way to make the family feel comfortable
about what people could and could not do in
my home. Foster families are often told to write
the rules of the home down for the foster children.
This is also a good way to establish boundaries
with the parents. Everyone feels better and
more accepted if they know what to expect. There
are few situations where visits in the foster
home may not work but for the most part they
can be made to be very safe and appropriate.
I particularly remember one Christmas when
Brenda shared with me that she had very little
money to buy gifts for the holidays. I told
her what Johnny had asked for Christmas. Johnny
and one of my sons were nearly the same age
and were in the same grade in school. They usually
played with the same types of toys and games.
They both wanted snow boards for Christmas.
I purchased the snowboards and thought all was
well until Johnny returned from spending Christmas
with Brenda and the other children. He brought
with him a much larger and more expensive snowboard
then the one I had bought for both he and my
son. It seems that Johnny not only asked his
mother and I for a snowboard, but had also asked
his maternal grandmother! Sometimes even parents
who communicate well cannot cover all the bases.
Johnny's two Moms shared a special smile
and learned a lesson on what to do the next
time!
As foster, adoptive and kinship parents, it
is important to keep an open mind about the
birth family members. Good communication between
all the parents can be the best way to assist
a child in reunification and or in moving towards
some other form of permanency.
~Bette |